Minnesota

  Labor Lawyer.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Labor-Law
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Labor Law News

 

OSHA Fines Company $138,200 For Workplace Safety Violations

CLEVELAND -- The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed $138,200 in fines against Florand Co., Youngstown, Ohio, for alleged willful, repeat and serious violations of workplace safety and health standards.

OSHA opened an inspection at Florand's Youngstown manufacturing plant in January after receiving information that safety guards had been removed from stamping presses. Among the items the company manufactures are strapping seals and tools and metal stampings.

The investigation resulted in citations issued to the Florand Co. alleging six willful, 12 serious and five repeat violations of federal workplace safety and health regulations. The alleged serious violations include an insufficient program to lock out machinery during maintenance; lack of safety guards on various machines; deficiencies with mechanical power presses; several electrical hazards; and an improperly secured liquefied petroleum (LP) gas container.

OSHA issues a serious citation when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Violations are categorized as willful where there was either an intentional disregard or plain indifference to employee safety or OSHA regulations. Alleged willful violations include employee exposure to the potential unexpected start-up of machines or equipment (failure to lock out), 21 mechanical power presses that were not properly safeguarded, and failure to inspect and conduct repairs to machines as necessary.

Violations are categorized as a repeat if the employer has been cited previously for the same condition. Alleged repeat violations include the failure to train employees on the use of fire extinguishers, failure to guard drive belts and pulleys, electrical hazards and not maintaining a written hazard-communication program for employees.

"Several of these violations were revealed during a previous inspection, but this employer failed to maintain a safe workplace," said OSHA Area Director Rob Medlock of Cleveland. "When employers shirk their responsibility to keep the workplace free of such hazards, the results can be tragic for workers and their families."

The company has 15 working days from receipt of the citations to appeal them before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Contact our Minnesota Labor Law Lawyer Now!

 



  Newsroom  
 


News about Labor Law cases in Minnesota and nationwide:

EEOC And BNSF Railway Agree To Settle Age Discrimination Lawsuit For $800,000
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) today announced that they had agreed to settle an age discrimina...
Read more >


Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao Unveils FY 2006 Budget
WASHINGTON—U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao today outlined the President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 budget for the Department of Labor. The Pres...
Read more >


Sponsored By The Labor Department’s
SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Department of Labor will hold a free workshop to help employers and pension plan administrators comply with the Employee R...
Read more >


More Labor Law News >

 
 

Labor Law Terms

 


Today's Terms

Unfair labor practice strike

Definition:
Employees who take part in an unfair labor practice strike retain their status as employees. Once the NLRB determines an employer's actions to be an unfair labor practice, employees are entitled to have their old jobs back, even if their employer has hire

Revenue

Definition:
Payments received by businesses from selling goods and services.

Uniformity of the rule's application

Definition:
It is unlawful to apply rules to singled-out individuals only. Inconsistencies in rule applications violate the Just-Cause context of employer and employee.

More Labor Law Terms >

 

Labor Law Resources

 


Search Labor Law resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Labor Law Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Labor Law:

  • Collective Bargaining
  • Discrimination law
  • Employment Agreements
  • Employment Litigation
  • Fair Labor Standards Act
  • Labor relations
  • Mediation
  • Occupational safety & health
  • OFCCP
  • Strike Support
  • Wrongful Discharge

More Labor Law Topics >

Minnesota Labor-Law Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Labor-Law attorney you should contact our Labor-Law Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Andover
  • Anoka
  • Austin
  • Bemidji
  • Brainerd
  • Burnsville
  • Circle Pines
  • Cottage Grove
  • Eden Prairie
  • Elk River
  • Faribault
  • Hastings
  • Lakeville
  • Mankato
  • Minneapolis
  • Moorhead
  • Osseo
  • Owatonna
  • Rochester
  • Saint Cloud
  • Saint Paul
  • Stillwater
  • Winona
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Minnesota Labor Lawyer.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.